English term
becoming a cheap Red Lobster or a fish McDonald’s
I am trying to understand what is meant by this expression. I am assuming that there is quite a difference between the two restaurants in terms of their target customer or style of providing the service. To my understanding, to become like a cheap Red Lobster means offering convenient food at lower prices. I don't get what is meant by becoming a fish McDonald's, though. What is so special about it? Is it the fast service as a drive-thru, for example? Here is the context:
"The creative part of developing strategy is finding the sweet spot that aligns the firm’s capabilities with customer needs in a way that competitors cannot match given the changing external context – factors such as technology, industry demographics, and regulation. We have found that one of the best ways to do this is to develop two or three plausible but very different strategic options. For example, fleshing out two dramatically different alternatives – becoming a cheap Red Lobster or a fish McDonald’s – helped executives at the Long John Silver’s chain of restaurants understand the strategic choices that they had to make. They had been trying to do a bit of everything, and this exercise showed them that their initiatives – such as offering early-evening table service and expanding drive-through service – were strategically inconsistent. (Competing on the basis of table service requires bigger restaurants and more employees, while drive-through service requires high-traffic locations and smaller footprints.) As a result, they chose to be a fish McDonald’s, building smaller restaurants with drive-through service in high-traffic locations."
Could you please help clarify the meaning for me?
Thanks in advance.
4 +2 | [see below] | Michael Beijer |
3 -4 | buying/eating inexpensive food at Red Lobster or Fish McBites at McDonald's | Oliver Simões |
fish McDonald's | Oliver Simões |
refs | Michael Beijer |
Nov 18, 2023 13:09: Rachel Fell changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Non-PRO (3): Yvonne Gallagher, Christopher Schröder, Rachel Fell
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
[see below]
"fleshing out two dramatically different alternatives – becoming a cheap Red Lobster or a fish McDonald’s – helped executives at the Long John Silver’s chain of restaurants understand the strategic choices that they had to make. They had been trying to do a bit of everything, and this exercise showed them that their initiatives – such as offering early-evening table service and expanding drive-through service – were strategically inconsistent."
This wasn't working, so they opted to focus on ONE strategic directions, namely, becoming a fish McDonald’s.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 39 mins (2023-11-17 18:19:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
sorry, I meant to also make this bit bold:
"helped executives at the Long John Silver’s chain of restaurants understand the strategic choices that they had to make."
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 43 mins (2023-11-17 18:23:28 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
on a whim, I thought I'd ask ChatGPT (v. 4), to save me some time; here's what it said:
=====================
MY QUESTION:
what does "becoming a cheap Red Lobster or a fish McDonald’s" mean in:
"The creative part of developing strategy is finding the sweet spot that aligns the firm’s capabilities with customer needs in a way that competitors cannot match given the changing external context – factors such as technology, industry demographics, and regulation. We have found that one of the best ways to do this is to develop two or three plausible but very different strategic options. For example, fleshing out two dramatically different alternatives – becoming a cheap Red Lobster or a fish McDonald’s – helped executives at the Long John Silver’s chain of restaurants understand the strategic choices that they had to make. They had been trying to do a bit of everything, and this exercise showed them that their initiatives – such as offering early-evening table service and expanding drive-through service – were strategically inconsistent. (Competing on the basis of table service requires bigger restaurants and more employees, while drive-through service requires high-traffic locations and smaller footprints.) As a result, they chose to be a fish McDonald’s, building smaller restaurants with drive-through service in high-traffic locations."
=====================
CHATGPT'S ANSWER:
In the context of this passage, "becoming a cheap Red Lobster or a fish McDonald's" refers to two contrasting strategic directions that a business, in this case, the Long John Silver’s chain of restaurants, could take.
(1) Becoming a Cheap Red Lobster: Red Lobster is known as a mid-range seafood restaurant chain. So, becoming a "cheap Red Lobster" would imply focusing on offering seafood dining experiences at lower prices than Red Lobster, possibly with a more casual or simplified service model. This strategy would still involve sit-down dining but would aim to make it more affordable and accessible.
(2) Becoming a Fish McDonald's: McDonald's is globally recognized for its fast-food service model, characterized by quick service, low prices, and convenience. In this scenario, "becoming a fish McDonald's" means adopting a fast-food model for seafood, focusing on drive-through service, speed, high-traffic locations, and smaller restaurant footprints. This would be a move away from traditional sit-down dining to a quick-service format.
The overall point being made is about the importance of strategic clarity and consistency in business. Long John Silver's, by considering these two very different strategies, realized that their existing approach was inconsistent – they were trying to offer both table service (which requires a certain type of restaurant setup) and drive-through service (which requires a different setup). This exercise helped them understand the need to choose one strategic direction that aligns with their capabilities and market needs, leading them to opt for the "fish McDonald's" model. This decision aligns their operational model with a clear strategic focus, ensuring consistency in their business approach.
agree |
Christopher Schröder
: Yes, quite nbiously. Why do non-natives constantly answer these English questions?
55 mins
|
Thanks! Good question.
|
|
agree |
Andrew Bramhall
3 hrs
|
Thanks!
|
|
neutral |
philgoddard
: I hate to say this, but CheatGPT has explained what these two terms mean, and you haven't.
10 hrs
|
neutral |
Yvonne Gallagher
: ChatGPT gave a good explanation, unlike you. Yes, it's already answered in the text but you clearly need to explain that for Asker!
15 hrs
|
buying/eating inexpensive food at Red Lobster or Fish McBites at McDonald's
neutral |
Michael Beijer
: you are missing the point
30 mins
|
disagree |
Christopher Schröder
: Not about food
1 hr
|
disagree |
Andrew Bramhall
: Sadly not; agree with above comments;
4 hrs
|
disagree |
Daryo
: You missed the meaning completely as you used a terminally wrong method: you didn't bother with reading the context instead of getting distracted by your personal opinions which are IRRELEVANT for the purpose of translating the ST.
1 day 6 hrs
|
disagree |
AllegroTrans
: Your "explanation" is nothing of the kind, just your opinion and, as Daryo says, irrelevant
3 days 4 hrs
|
Reference comments
fish McDonald's
disagree |
Christopher Schröder
: It’s comparing chains not food
4 mins
|
Discussion
The catch is to understand what these two chains - Red Lobster and McDonald’s - associate with in USA, in which ways they operate differently.